Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22134 (RAJ)

SATISH KUMAR MEENA S/O KALYAN SHAI MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/9733/2025 · 2025-07-07

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24983] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9733/2025 1. Satish Kumar Meena S/o Kalyan Shai Meena, R/o Talawada Ki Dhani, Sindoli, Dausa, Rajasthan -303325 2. Abhishek Sharma S/o Bhudatt Sharma, R/o 1/575 Uit Colony Bhiwadi, Rajasthan. 3. Pardeep Sharma D/o Ram Bharosi Sharma, R/o 63, Gali Balla Dauboliya Nagar Jagner Agra. 4. Sheetal Jangid D/o Jagdish Prashad Jangid, R/o Vill Khirkhiri, Post Dabra Teh Sapotra Dis Karauli, Rajasthan 5. Kuldeep Singh Meena S/o Manmohan Meena, R/o Near Old Truck Union, Shiv Colony. Karauli, Rajasthan 6. Sunil Kumar Meena S/o Kamlesh Meena, R/o Vpo Baijupara Teh Baijupara, Dausa Rajasthan 7. Manish Kumar S/o Vinod Kumar Sharma, R/o Ward No. 1 , Binjh Bayala, Ganganagar, Rajasthan - 335041 8. Virender Kumar S/o Liladhar, R/o Vpo Hilsar, Jhunjhunuu, Rajasthan ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur - 302005 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Chairman/ Secretary Rajasthan Public Service Commision, Ghooghara Ghati, Jaipur Road, Ajmer 305001 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Saini Mr. Ajit Kaswa For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 07/07/2025 1. The grievance of petitioners is that the Mains Examination of the Rajasthan Administrative Services (RAS) Examination 2024, scheduled on 18.06.2025, be rescheduled so that same may not be overlapped with the other competitive examination. 2. It has been submitted that the scheduled examination has already been conducted, hence, the issue raised by the petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:24983] (2 of 2) [CW-9733/2025] do not survive any more and they seek permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. In such view, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In case, petitioners want to pursue the writ petition for cancellation of the examination, petitioners are at liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if so desired. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /7