APHC010312722023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: Ravula Penchala Narasaiah and Others Shashi Bhushan Kumar I A S and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. S SIVA KUMARI 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as against the orders in Writ Petition No.13187 of 2018, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt case, the respondents have preferred writ appeal vide W.A.No.997 of 2024, and the said appeal was dis C.C.No.3502 of 2023 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3502/2023 Ravula Penchala Narasaiah and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Shashi Bhushan Kumar I A S and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): CH C KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: counsel for the petitioner submitted that as against the orders in Writ Petition No.13187 of 2018, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt case, the respondents have preferred writ appeal vide W.A.No.997 of 2024, and the said appeal was disposed of modifying the RC,J C.C.No.3502 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER(S) ...CONTEMNOR(S) counsel for the petitioner submitted that as against the orders in Writ Petition No.13187 of 2018, disobedience of which is complained of in this Contempt case, the respondents have preferred writ appeal vide posed of modifying the RC,J C.C.No.3502 of 2023 2 orders impugned thereby removing the interest part from the date of receiving exgratia till the date of filing of writ petition. Consequently, the orders passed in W.P.No.13187 of 2018 was merged with the orders passed in the writ appeal. In view of the same the contempt case can be closed giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the other remedies as and when occasion arises. 2. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Case is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedies. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR