Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22129 (CHH)

RAMNATH GOND v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCRC/3873/2025 · 2025-05-19

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:22140 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 3873 of 2025 Ramnath Gond S/o Chhote Babu Gond Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Rahaud, Ward No. 1, P.S. Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate, District Janjgir- Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Applicant : Shri C.P. Lahrey, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, Dy.A.G. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 20/05/2025 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.96/2025 registered at Police Station GOURI MUDALIAR Digitally signed by GOURI MUDALIAR Date: 2025.05.20 17:52:50 +0530 2 Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 02.04.2025 the police has received information from the informant thereafter the police has seized total 40 bulk liter handmade Mahuwa liquor. Accordingly the alleged offence is registered and the applicant has been arrested for offence under section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and 40 bulk liter handmade Mahuwa liquor was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, minimum punishment is one year and maximum punishment is three years. He submits that co-accused person namely Sumit Kumar Suryawanshi has been granted regular bail by this Court vide MCRC No.3356/2025 on 01/05/2025. He also submits that charge sheet has been filed, the applicant is in jail since 02/04/2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and the applicant has one criminal antecedent under the Excise Act of the year 2024. He 3 further submits that 40 bulk liter handmade Mahuwa liquor was recovered from the possession of the applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact that the applicant has one criminal antecedent under the Excise Act of the year 2024, also the fact that co-accused person namely Sumit Kumar Suryawanshi has been granted regular bail by this Court vide MCRC No.3356/2025 on 01/05/2025 he is in jail since 02/04/2025 and the charge-sheet has been filed, further the conclusion of the trial may take some more time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Let the applicant - Ramnath Gond , involved in Crime No.96/2025 registered at Police Station Shivrinarayan, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are 4 present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such 5 default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice gouri