Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22124 (JHR)

SARFARAJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4213/2025 · 2025-08-11

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:22986 --1-- A.B.A. No. 4213 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4213 of 2025 ---- Sarfaraj Ansari, age 21 years old, son of Ebrahim Ansari, resident of village – Karke, PO – Sonehara, PS – Dandai, District – Garhwa .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate ---- 02/11.08.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.345 of 2024, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 392 and 411 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Special Judge POCSO Act-cum-Additional Sessions Judge- III, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the name of the petitioner has been falsely taken by co-accused persons and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. He submits that the petitioner is a student of B.Pharma and further the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition. He further submits that the person who has taken the 2025:JHHC:22986 --2-- A.B.A. No. 4213 of 2025 name of the petitioner has already been granted regular bail by learned Sessions Judge. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of looting camera and mobile phone. 5. It has been pointed out that the petitioner is a student of B.Pharma and the person who has taken the name of the petitioner has been granted regular bail by learned Sessions Judge and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge POCSO Act-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-III, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No.345 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/