Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22121 (KAR)

SRI.BABU POOJARY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/9748/2025 · 2025-04-07

N S Sanjay Gowda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:14667 WP No. 9748 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 9748 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI.BABU POOJARY S/O LATE LOKU POOJARY, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT SHIVALLI VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT - 576 102 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ARVIND.N., FOR SIR. MOHANKUMARA D., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (JDLR) ADDRESS KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA - 576201. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS (DDLR) ADDRESS, KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT. KARNATAKA - 576201. 4. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS AND SURVEY SETTLEMENT (ADLR) ADDRESS KUNDAPURA, UDUPI DISTRICT KARNATAKA - 576201. 5. THE TALUK SURVEYOR ADDRESS, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT - 576201 Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:14667 WP No. 9748 of 2025 6. SRI H V RAGHAVENDRA BHATT FATHER NAME NOT KNOWN, ADDRESS CAR STREET, UDUPI, KARNATAKA - 576 101. (REPRESENTATIVE OF SRI ADMARU MATHADA KALIYAMARDHANA KRISHNA DEVARU) …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.MANJUNATH., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO R-4 TO CONSIDER AND DECIDE THE PETITIONERS OBJECTION DTD. 15.03.2025 ON MERITS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW BEFORE TAKING FURTHER ACTION ON APPLICATION NO. 16020325818555 DTD. 14.03.2025 SUBMITTED BY R-6 FOR THE PREPARATION OF HUDBUST VIDE ANNX-H1, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this writ petition is to direct respondent No.4 to consider the objections raised by the petitioner to the proposed survey. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner and the contesting respondent are litigating in O.S.No.34/2025 and there is an interim order in his favour and, therefore, the survey could not be conducted. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:14667 WP No. 9748 of 2025 3. In my view, in the light of this assertion, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the objections raised by the petitioner before he decides to conduct a survey. 4. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 5. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31