Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22115 (KAR)

SRI KRISHNAPPA V v. THE COMMISSIONER

WP/10849/2020 · 2025-06-02

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19114 WP No. 10849 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 10849 OF 2020 (GM-R/C) BETWEEN: SRI. KRISHNAPPA V, S/O THE LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.74/3, SOMESHWARA EXTENSION, NEAR SHANTINEKETANA SCHOOL, KODI CHIKKANAHALLI ROAD, BILEKAHALLI, BENGALURU - 560 076. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JANARDHANA G, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF THE HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE COMMISSION, A.V. ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET, BENGALURU - 560 018. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19114 WP No. 10849 of 2020 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DATED 21.05.2020 UNDER ANNEXURE-G AND ALSO THE LEGAL NOTICE DATED 18.6.2020 UNDER ANNEXURE-H AND CONSEQUENTLY PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO OPEN THE TEMPLE ACCORDINGLY AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioner is before this court seeking for the following reliefs: (i) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 21.05.2020 under Annexure-G and also the legal notice dated 18.06.2020 under Annexure-H and consequently permit the petitioner to open the temple accordingly; and (ii) Grant any other writ, order or direction s this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant to the petitioner in the circumstances of the case. 2. The contention of the petitioner is that in Sy.No.106 of Bilekahalli Village, Bengaluru, the ancestors of the petitioner had constructed a temple for the family deity Lord MuneshwaraSwamy and from then on, they have been offering pujas to the deity in said temple. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19114 WP No. 10849 of 2020 3. It is contended that said temple is not included under the list prepared under the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institution Charitable Endowments Act and it is only Someshwara temple, which is included in the said list. 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that under the guise of the inclusion of Someshwara temple in the list, the respondent-State has seized the possession of MuneshwaraSwamy Temple, which is a family temple of the petitioner, in furtherance of which the petitioners have submitted a representation dated 21.05.2020 at Annexure-G as also issued a legal notice dated 18.06.2020 under Annexure-H. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate submits that the said representation will be considered in accordance with law. 6. This court, vide order dated 14.10.2020 had permitted the petitioner by way of an interim direction to perform puja at the MuneshwaraSwamy Temple in Survey Number 106, Bilekahalli Village, Bengaluru, and directed the respondent not to obstruct with the same. In that view of the matter, I pass the following: ORDER (i) Writ petition is allowed. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19114 WP No. 10849 of 2020 (ii) A mandamus is issued directing respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated the 21.05.2020 at Annexure G and the legal notice dated 18.06.2020 at Annexure H. (iii) Until such consideration and orders being passed, the respondents are directed not to interfere with the pujas being conducted by the petitioner at the MuneshwaraSwamy Temple in Survey Number 106, Bilekahalli Village, Bangalore. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12 CT: BHK