Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22110 (RAJ)

SALMAN ALIAS RAVI S/O SHRI SALIM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7892/2025 · 2025-08-04

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29760] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7892/2025 Salman Alias Ravi S/o Shri Salim, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kansali, Police Station Nageena, District Nuh (Haryana) (At Present Accused In Judicial Custody At District Jail Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Azad Ahmed For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 04/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.193/2025 registered at Police Station Ramgarh (Alwar), District Alwar for the offence punishable under Sections 127(2), 140(3), 308(2) & 351(2) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that on account of concocted story with regard to fare of taxi, this false case has been instituted against the petitioner. He submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against him. Trial of the case will take considerable time and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:29760] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7892/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Salman Alias Ravi S/o Shri Salim shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /215