Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22106 (AP)

T BHASKAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/15641/2025 · 2025-06-26

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC01O311312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15641 OF 2025 Between: T Bhaskar, S/o. Kotaiah, Aged 43 years, Occ Field Assistant, Kannavaram Village, Sathyavedu Mandal, Tirupati District ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Rural Development Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner Director, Panchayat Raj Rural Development Department, PVS Icon Building, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency (DWMA) Tirupati District, Tirupati. 4. The Program Officer Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Sathyavedu Mandal, Tirupati District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Roc.No.K1/377/2025 dt.21.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent in terminating the services of petitioner as Field Assistant, with immediate effect, without issuing any notice, without following the due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, Consequently set-aside the proceedings in Roc.No.K1/377/2025 dt.21.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, by reinstating the petitioner into his services as Field Assistant lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to the suspend the proceedings in Roc.No.K1/377/2025 dt.21.05.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, by reinstating the petitioner into his services as Field Assistant pending disposal of the main writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V VINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SMT. B V APARNA LAKSHMI The Court made the following order: I \'t}' APHC010311312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA^ PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] I r ■ • 1 FRIDAY, THE TW,ENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE •'V PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 15641/2025 Between: j ...PETITIONER T Bhaskar ■ AND I ■ ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Ap and Others '.V/ ■■ Counsel for the Petitioner: i 1.VVINOD K REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I 2 HCGRJ W.P.No.15641 of 2025 % Xhe Court made the following Order: The present writ petition challenges 21.05.2025, issued by the 3 petitioner as Field Assistant at Kannvaram Mandal, Tirupati District. the order dated ■i rd respondeiit, terminating the services of Village, Sathyavedu 2 Heard Sri V.Vinod K Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, teamed Assistant Government Pleader far Services-I for respondent . --r" Nos, 1 to 3 and Smt B.V.Aparna Lakshmi, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.4. 3 Learned counsel for the impugned termination is referred to subject line, the operative portion treats it as the said termination has not notice or inquiry, the same is bad in law. petitioner submits that though • vf • as a temporary order in the as a final termination and preceded with any show cause ' ' " ■ • • ■' ' ■ 4. Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel Instructibns submits that the petitioner has been - , ^uspensior:!, in view of registration of crime respondents are in the on placed under against him. Now, the process of issuing show cause notice and after conducting inquiry, necessary action would be taken. . ' /5 In view of aforesaid submissions. as the impugned order only states suspension pending inquiry, the Writ Petition is disposed of. 3 HCGftJ W.P.No.15641 of 2025 directing the respondents to follow the procedure as contemplated undet the Field Assistant Human Resource Policy, by issuing cause notice and after conducting proper inquiry, take a final a show decision on the same. The respondents shall conclude process within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. the said As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shaJI stand closed. Sd/- A VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh,. Pahchayat Raj Rural Development Department, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudif Guntur District. 2. The Commissioner Director, Panchayat Raj Rural Development, Department, PVS Icon Building, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency (DWMA) Tirupati District, Tirupati. 4. The Program Officer Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Sathyavedu Mandal, Tirupati District. 5. OneCCto SRI VV!NOD K REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies ■fins gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 27/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 15641 OF 2025 \ 8 JUL 2025 )§ ^'^sXutrent *3- DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS