Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22101 (JHR)

JOGENDRA BHUIA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/711/2024 · 2025-01-14

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 711 of 2024 ---------- Jogendra Bhuia, aged about 45 years, son of Somar Bhuia, resident of Near No.3 PIT, Sendra Bansjora, P.O. & P.S. Bansjora, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Mr. Samir Dutta, son of not known to the petitioner, Chairman-cum- Managing Director, M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dist.-Dhanbad 3.Mr. Murli Krishna Pawaria, son of not known to the petitioner, Director Personnel, M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dist.-Dhanbad 4.Mr. Bidyut Sah son of not known to the petitioner, General Manager (P & IR), M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dist.-Dhanbad 5.Mr. Chandan Sinha, son of not known to the petitioner, Project Officer, Madhuban Colliery, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Barora Area, Dist.-Bokaro ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar Jha, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Sanket Khana, AC to AAG-V Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate ---------- 04/ 14.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that the order of this Court has already been complied with. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, the same is dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. 4. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if aggrieved. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-