Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22098 (JHR)

Mrs Geeta Khalkho v. Umesh Jaimesh Kujur

MA/656/2016 · 2025-02-11

Gautam Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M. A. No. 656 of 2016 ----- Mrs. Geeta Khalko, W/o Mr. Yakub Khalko, R/o H.No. 1245, B-Block, Sonari Basti, P.O & P.S.-Sonari, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum … …. Appellant Versus Umesh Jaimesh Kujur, S/o Late Anand M. Kujur, R/o Holding No. 1245, Christian Basti, Sonari, P.O. & P.S.-Sonari, Jamshedpur, Dist.-Singhbhum East … …. Respondent ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ----- For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : ----- Oral Order 12 / Dated : 11.02.2025 From perusal of the earlier order dated 17.01.2025, it appears that learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant had given No Objection to the appellant for engaging another counsel but till date no fresh Vakalatnama has been filed. Further, the appellant was directed to appear either in person or through his counsel vide order dated 17.01.2025, but till date none appeared on his behalf. Under the circumstance, this Misc. Appeal is dismissed for default on account of non-prosecution. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra