Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M. A. No. 656 of 2016
-----
Mrs. Geeta Khalko, W/o Mr. Yakub Khalko, R/o H.No. 1245, B-Block, Sonari Basti, P.O & P.S.-Sonari, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum
… …. Appellant
Versus
Umesh Jaimesh Kujur, S/o Late Anand M. Kujur, R/o Holding No. 1245, Christian Basti, Sonari, P.O. & P.S.-Sonari, Jamshedpur, Dist.-Singhbhum East
… …. Respondent
----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----- For the Appellant
: None
For the Respondent :
----- Oral Order
12 / Dated : 11.02.2025
From perusal of the earlier order dated 17.01.2025, it appears that learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant had given No Objection to the appellant for engaging another counsel but till date no fresh Vakalatnama has been filed. Further, the appellant was directed to appear either in person or through his counsel vide order dated 17.01.2025, but till date none appeared on his behalf.
Under the circumstance, this Misc. Appeal is dismissed for default on account of non-prosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) AKT/Satendra