M/S APEEJAY TEA LIMITED ( PROP. SESSA TEA ESTATE) v. UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS
WP(C)/7054/2024 · 2025-05-25
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22096 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 22096 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010272052024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7054/2024 M/S APEEJAY TEA LIMITED ( PROP. SESSA TEA ESTATE) A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT APPEJAY HOUSE, 15-PARK STREET, KOLKATA-700020, WEST BENGAL, HAVING ITS TEA ESTATE AT THAKURBARI, P.O.-THAKURBARI, DIST- SONITPUR, PIN-784503, ASSAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (TAXATION), SRI SAGAR MANADAL, S/O LATE ANIL KUMAR MANDAL, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O 6/17/7, KAILASH GHOSH ROAD, BEHALA, KOLKATA, PIN-700008 VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMERCE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, VANIJYA BHAWAN, 16, AKBAR ROAD, NEW, NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE CHAIRMAN TEA BOARD INDIA 14 B.T.M.
SARANI (BRABOURNE ROAD) KOLKATA-700001 (WEST BENGAL) 3:DY. CHAIRMAN TEA BOARD INDIA 14 B.T.M.
SARANI (BRABOURNE ROAD) KOLKATA-700001 (WEST BENGAL) 4:THE DIRECTOR OF TEA DEVLOPMENT
Page No.# 2/3 TEA BOARD INDIA 14 B.T.M.
SARANI (BRABOURNE ROAD) KOLKATA-700001 (WEST BENGAL) 5:THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR NORTH-EAST ZONAL OFFICE HOUSEFED COMPLEX (5TH FLOOR) CENTRAL BLOCK BELTOLA-BASISTHA ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM) 6:THE DY. DIRECTOR OF TEA DEVELOPMENT NORTH-EAST ZONAL OFFICE HOUSEFED COMPLEX (6TH FLOOR) CENTRAL BLOCK BELTOLA-BASISTHA ROAD DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 (ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. D SAHU, MR. R S MISHRA,MS M GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. R K D CHOUDHURY ( DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER 26.05.2025 Shri AK Gupta, learned counsel appearing on instructions of Shri RS Mishra,
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there are certain formal defects in the cause-title for which he would like to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Also heard Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri RKD Choudhury, learned Dy.SGI, who does not have any objection.
Page No.# 3/3 The writ petition is accordingly dismissed on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh. JUDGE Comparing Assistant