Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22083 (RAJ)

CHAIRMAN NAGAR PALIKA MANDAL AND ANR v. SHIMLA DEVI THR LRS AND ANR

CSA/517/2017 · 2025-03-28

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14462] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 517/2017 1. Chairman Nagar Palika, Mandal, Dholpur At Present Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Dholpur. 2. Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Mandal Dholpur At Present Commissioner, Nagar Parishad, Dholpur. ----Appellants Versus 1. Shimla Devi W/o Jaikishan R/o Mohalla Nangaja Old City Dholpur. (Since Deceased). 1/1. Jai Kishan S/o Late Ram Singh, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/2. Rinku S/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/3. Rajnikant S/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/4. Ranjeeta D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/5. Radha D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/6 Neetu D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/7. Banty D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/8. Bavi D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 1/9. Bindiya D/o Shimla Devi, R/o House No. 12/54, Lkhasa Near Raghunath Takiya, Tehsil And District Agra Uttarpradesh. 2. Ramdayal S/o Shri Viharilal, R/o Msudpur, Dholpur. [2025:RJ-JP:14462] (2 of 2) [CSA-517/2017] ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashvendra Singh Rathore for Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 28/03/2025 None present for appellant. It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal, hence same is dismissed for non-prosecution. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /55