APHC010311772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15738/2025 Between: 1. SRI CHIGURUPATI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O. CH. SANKAR RAO, AGED ABOUT 48 YRS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O- PERECHERLA VILLAGE, MEDIKONDURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522005. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL HOME SECRETARY SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, ONGOLE ONGOLE DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TRIPURANATAKAM P.S, ONGOLE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering the First Information Report and not taking any initiative/steps with respect to the complaint given by the petitioner in respect of threatening the petitioner to demolish and dispossess the petitioner from the agricultural land situated in R.Sy.No. 68/1, and 69 to an extent of Ac.53.00 2 HN, J W.P.No.15738 of 2025 cents, Narasingapuram village, Andhra Pradesh as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, null and void and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent authorities to immediately take action on the complaint given by the petitioner dt- 12-02-2025 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 HN, J W.P.No.15738 of 2025 ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner’s complaint dated 12.02.2025. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents submits that the petitioner’s complaint dated 12.02.2025 will be considered by the concerned respondents, as per law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to dispose off the writ petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the concerned respondents to consider the petitioner’s complaint dated 12.02.2025, in accordance with law and the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the BNSS, 2023. 5. With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HN, J W.P.No.15738 of 2025 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 1st July, 2025 cbn 5 HN, J W.P.No.15738 of 2025 138 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.15738 of 2025 1st July, 2025 cbn