Pandiyan v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Gudalur South
CRL OP(MD)/23167/2025 · 2025-12-16
L Victoria Gowri
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 220786 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 220786 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI Crl.O.P.(MD).No.23167 of 2025 1.Pandiyan 2.Vijaya ... Petitioners
Vs. The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its, The Inspector of Police, Gudalur South Police Station, Theni District. ... Respondents Prayer
: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry in connection with Crime No.72 of 2025 dated
07.06.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Gomathisankar For Respondents : Mr.M.Sakthi Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025
ORDER
Seeking to direct the respondent Police not to harass the petitioners under the guise of enquiry in connection with Crime No.72 of 2025 dated 07.06.2025, this petition is filed. 2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that earlier the petitioner lodged a complaint against one Pandian for assaulting the petitioner, however, the respondent police, without taking action with respect to the petitioner's complaint, registered a First Information Report in Crime No.72 of 2025 against the petitioner on.
07.06.2025. On that premise, the police is subjecting the petitioner to continuous harassment and hence, sought the indulgence of this Court. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), Mr. M. Sakthi Kumar, on instructions, submitted that the petitioners are moneylenders from whom one Pandeeswaran had borrowed an amount of Rs.1,50,000/- at an interest rate of 4%. Due to the default committed by 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 the said Pandeeswaran, the petitioners frequently visited his house and indulged in hooliganism, even to the extent of breaking the footpath. Hence, the respondent police was left with no other option but to register a First Information Report against the petitioners. 4.Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record.
5. To allay the petitioners’ apprehension and to ensure fairness, the following directions are issued: (a) If any complaint is received against the petitioners, the respondent-police shall issue written summons/notice under Section 62 BNSS, 2023, specifying the date, time, and purpose of enquiry. Oral or informal summons are prohibited. (b) The enquiry, if undertaken, shall be completed within two weeks from the date of the petitioners’ appearance. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 (c) If the police, upon enquiry, conclude that a cognizable offence is made out and propose to register an FIR, the petitioners shall be given prior written notice, enabling him to seek legal remedies including anticipatory bail. (d) If the dispute is found to be civil in nature, the complaint shall be closed forthwith, without any coercive or intimidatory action.
6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is
disposed of. 16.12.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No vsg 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, Gudalur South Police Station, Theni District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
vsg CRL OP(MD)No.23167 of 2025 16.12.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis