IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMP No. 19585 of 2024 in Ex. Petition No. 296 of 2023 Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Hari Ram ……...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. C.N. Singh & Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocates. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents/State. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copy of communication dated 01.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Divisional Forest Officer, Karsog Forest Division, H.P. Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Advocate General representing the respondents/State, states that Pension Disbursing Authority i.e., District Treasury Officer, Mandi, District 2 Mandi, H.P. after having carried out rectification/correction, has duly disbursed pension in favour of the petitioner, as is evident from his office letter No. Fin (TR) – MND-Pen-2025-3591 dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure A-I) annexed with the aforesaid communication. 2. Learned Advocate General while referring to communication dated 01.09.2025 (Annexure A-1) states that sum of Rs.6,56,438/- and Rs.6,71,072/- stand paid to the petitioner in two installments, on 01.09.2025, vide bill Nos. 101008 and 101010 respectively. Learned counsel representing the petitioner as per instructions, states that the petitioner has only received one amount i.e., Rs.6,71,072/-. 3. Though this Court has reason to presume and believe that by now sum of Rs.6,71,072/- has been paid to the petitioner, and if not paid, the same shall be paid, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one week. 4. Consequently in view of above, nothing remains to adjudicate in the instant proceeding and accordingly same are closed, with the directions to the respondents/State to ensure that balance payment, if any, is paid expeditiously, preferably, within a period of one week and thereafter petitioner herein shall be paid pension on regular basis, failing which petitioner would be at liberty to get the present petition revived so that appropriate action in accordance with 3 law is taken towards the implementation of the judgment, sought to be executed. September 02, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Shamsh Tabrez) Judge