Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2207 (GAU)

Bajong Pertin v. Gemin Pertin and 2 Ors

RSA/7/2025 · 2026-02-16

Budi Habung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040012722025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : RSA/7/2025 Bajong Pertin Son of Shri Maktel Pertin, Village Poblung, PO Dambuk, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Gemin Pertin and 2 Ors Son of Shri Makpak Pertin, Village Bolung, PO Bolung, Lower Dibang Valley District, Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Kabang Gamno Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Gongaying Gamno Village Kangkong PO Kangkong Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh. 3:Mibom Pertin Age: 0 Occupation : Son of Late Gora Pertin Village Bolung PO Bolung Lower Dibang Valley District Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Debo K Deori, Epra Melo Advocate for the Respondent : Jumgam Jini, Gyamar Jeevan,Migo Laye,Risso Aking,Bamang Tatung,O Deori,Taying Nega,Tao Tarin,Binter Picha Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 17.02.2026 Mr. Gamken Bam, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Mr. Jumgam Jini, learned counsel for the respondents, and Mr. Debo Kr. Deori, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that he has the instructions from both the learned counsels for the parties who are unable to appear before the Court today to the extent that the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties and as such, the matter has become infructuous and therefore, he has further instruction to withdraw the instant appeal on behalf of both the parties. In view of the above submission and since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and has become infructuous; the prayer for withdrawal of the appeal is allowed. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed on withdrawal. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant