[2025:RJ-JP:30524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7804/2025 Smt. Mala Singh W/o Sanjay Singh D/o Vashudev Narayan Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Akhaar Thana Dubhar, Dist. Baliya, U.p., Present House No. 3/1065 Ambedkar Nagar Kalyanpura, Tehsil Kanpur Sadar, Dist. Kanpur Nagar, U.p., Presently Tenant At House No. 233 Badodiya Basti, Nearby Classi Hotel Sindhi Colony, Nearby Railway Junction Jaipur, Thana Sadar Dist. Jaipur. (At Present Confined In Women Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Satya Pal Chandoliya HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.239/2025 registered at Police Station Malpura Gate, District Jaipur City (East) for the offence punishable under Sections 318(4) & 316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He submits that other co-accused person has already been granted benefit of bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. It is [2025:RJ-JP:30524] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7804/2025] contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel contends that petitioner is female who is in custody since 27.05.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate, as also considering the fact that other co-accused person has already been granted benefit of bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Smt. Mala Singh W/o Sanjay Singh D/o Vashudev Narayan Singh shall be released on bail provided, she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that [2025:RJ-JP:30524] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7804/2025] she shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /368