Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22055 (GAU)

RESHMI THAOSEN AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/80/2025 · 2025-01-26

Suman Shyam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010270952024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/80/2025 RESHMI THAOSEN AND 2 ORS W/O- LT. CN 808 BICHITRA MOHAN GOGOI OF 10TH A.P. BATTALION, R/O- 4TH ASSAM POLICE BATTALION, KAHILIPARA, DIST.- KAMRUP(M), ASSAM- 781019. 2: GOURI PHONGLO D/O- LT. CN 808 BICHITRA MOHAN GOGOI R/O- 4TH ASSAM POLICE BATTALION KAHILIPARA DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM- 781019. 3: SHERLYN GOGOI D/O- LT. CN 808 BICHITRA MOHAN GOGOI THROUGH RESHMI THAOSEN ( MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN) AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/O- 4TH ASSAM POLICE BATTALION KAHILIPARA DIST.- KAMRUP(M) ASSAM- 781019 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 4 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, I-BLOCK, 2ND FLOOR, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, ASSAM- 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSIONS HOUSEFED COMPLEX CENTRAL BLOCK 6TH FLOOR BELTOLA ROAD HOUSEFED GUWAHATI- 781006. 4:THE ASSISTANT INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE (WELFARE) ASSAM POLICE HEADQUARTERS ULUBARI GUWAHATI- 781007. 5:THE COMMANDANT 10TH ASSAM POLICE BATTALION KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI ASSAM- 781019. 6:HIMANTI GOGOI MOTHER OF- LT. CN 808 BICHITRA MOHAN GOGOI R/O- VILL- BOKUL MAJ GAON P.O./ P.S.- LAHOWAL DIST.- DIBRUGARH ASSAM- 786010 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAZUMDAR, MRS P RAI,MS T WAPANGLA,MR. R DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Page No.# 3/3 27.01.2025 Heard Mr. R. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. D. Borah, learned Govt. Advocate, Assam appearing for the respondents. This I.A. has been filed with a prayer to permit the applicant/writ petitioner to rectify the error in assigning the serial nos. to the respondents in the array of parties in WP(C) No.5478/2024. I have perused the statements made in the I.A. Mr. Borah submits that he would have no objection if the prayer is allowed. In view of the above, the prayer made in the I.A. in terms of the projection made therein, stands allowed. The applicants are permitted to carry out necessary correction in the serial numbers of the respondents accordingly and an amended cause title be placed on record within 10 days from today. I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant