[2025:RJ-JP:23479] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9483/2025 Kamla Kumari W/o Shri Lokesh Kumar, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Dheendhwa Athuna, District Jhunjhunu Presently Working On The Post Of Anm At Sub-Centre Bari, Phc Ardawata, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) Employee Id- Rjjj199823018373 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director, (Non-Gazetted) And Additional Director (Administration), Panchayati Raj (Medical) Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Ra.) 3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 4. Medical Officer Incharge, Phc Ardawata Block Chirawa Jhunjhunu (Raj.) 5. Leela, Presently Working On The Post Of Anm, Sub-Centre Bari Ka Bas, Phc Ardawata, District Jhunjhunu. 6. Sunita, Presently Working On Of The Post Padgaon, Chc Sarat, Block Jalore District Jalore. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devendra Kumar Bhardwaj Mr. Sumit Kumar Sihog For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.) Order 24/06/2025 1. By means of filing instant writ petition under Article 226/ 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been made by the petitioner to the order dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for short “the Tribunal”), dismissing her Appeal No.2742/2025 and affirming her transfer order dated 15.01.2025 as ANM from Sub-Center Bari, PHC Ardawara, District Jhunjhunu to District Jalore vice private respondent No.6. [2025:RJ-JP:23479] (2 of 2) [CW-9483/2025] 2. Having heard counsel for petitioner and from perusal of record, this Court finds that the Tribunal has considered the case of petitioner on merits, particularly in respect of amendment in the original transfer order dated 15.01.2025, vide order dated 02.05.2025. Indisputably, petitioner has been posted in District Jhunjhunu at various places since 2003. However, after arguing for some time, counsel for petitioner, having instructions of petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a representation before the respondents- Authorities, for redressal of her grievance. 3. This Court finds that a liberty to file representation has already been granted by the Tribunal vide order dated 09.06.2025, hence no liberty in this regard is required to be granted by this Court as well. 4. In view of above, permission to withdraw this writ petition is granted and the writ petition is hereby disposed of. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL (V.J.)), J Sachin/231