- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2198 RFA No. 865 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 865 OF 2023 (POS) BETWEEN: SRI. RUDRASHETTY R.B. AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O LATE SRI R.B.BASAPPA, R/AT NO 788/169, F-2, 19TH CROSS, RAMUNUJA ROAD, MYSORE-570 004. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. DEEPAK.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RASHMI.K W/O SRI ANIL RAJASHEKHARA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O NO 138, "SRI NILAYA", 1 CROSS, SRI SAI LOTUS LAYOUT, BEML V STAGE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA, BANGALORE-560 098. 2. SRI. SHIVASHANKAR AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 1ST FLOOR, NO.788/169, F-2, 19TH CROSS, RAMANUJA ROAD, MYSORE-570 001. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2198 RFA No. 865 of 2023 ORAL ORDER As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before Registrar (P & H) on several dates and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Again the appeal was listed before the Court and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again the appeal was listed on 06.01.2025, on that day, finally a week’s time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the office was directed to list the appeal under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’ on 20.01.2025. The appeal is listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections’. Despite granting sufficient time, the appellant has not complied with the office objections. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. In view of peremptory order dated 06.01.2025, the appeal is dismissed for non- compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33