Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22048 (KAR)

SMT N S RENUKAMMAA v. SRI S E HALAGAPPA

RSA/1585/2018 · 2025-04-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:17679 RSA No. 1585 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1585 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT N S RENUKAMMAA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS W/O S.E. GANESH R/O 379, 10TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, E AND F BLOCK, RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR, MYSURU – 570 022 2. S G VIDYASHREE D/O S E GANESH AND N S RENUKAMMA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O NO.379, 10TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, E & F BLOCK RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR MYSORE – 570 022 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. MANMOHAN P N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI S E HALAGAPPA S/O LATE S C ERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/O SHRIRANGALA VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 234 Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:17679 RSA No. 1585 of 2018 2. SMT B H MANJULA W/O S E GANESH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O M.E.S. PEENYA 3RD STAGE, SITE NO.15 RARVATHINAGAR BANGALORE-58 3. SMT G MANASA D/O MANJULA B H AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O M.E.S. PEENYA 3RD STAGE, SITE NO.15, RARVATHINAGAR BANGLAORE-58 4. SRI G SUDHARSHAN S/O MANJULA B H AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O M.E.S. SITE NO.15, PARVATHINAGAR BANGALORE-58 5. SRI SHIVARUDRAPPA S/O LATE S C ERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O SHRIRANGALA VILLAGE, KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 234 …RESPONDENTS (R1 TO R5 ARE SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S.100 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2018 PASSED IN RA NO 19/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.DISTRICT JUDGE KODAGU MADIKERI DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.01.2012 PASSED IN OS.NO.12/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MADIKERI. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:17679 RSA No. 1585 of 2018 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo seeking leave of the court to withdraw the appeal. 2. Memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, pending IAs do not survive for consideration and are disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SKS