Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22046 (KAR)

SMT N S RENUKAMMAA v. SRI S E HALAGAPPA

RSA/1585/2018 · 2025-04-24

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1585 OF 2018 BETWEEN 1. SMT N. S. RENUKAMMAA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O S. E. GANESH R/O NO.379, 10TH CROSS 5TH MAIN, E & F BLOCK RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR MYSORE – 570 022. 2. S. G. VIDYASHREE D/O S. E. GANESH AND N. S. RENUKAMMA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O NO.379, 10TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN, E & F BLOCK RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR MYSORE – 570 022. ... APPELLANT/S (By Sri. MANMOHAN P.N. ADVOCATE) …2 RSA NO. 1585/2018 2 AND 1. SRI. S. E. HALAGAPPA S/O LATE S. C. ERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/O SHRIRANGALA VILLAGE KUSHALNAGAR HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 234. 2 . SMT B H MANJULA W/O S. E. GANESH AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/O M.E.S. PEENYA 3RD STAGE, SITE NO.15 PARVATHINAGAR BANGALORE- 560 058. 3 . SMT G MANASA D/O MANJULA B. H. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O M.E.S. PEENYA 3RD STAGE, SITE NO.15 PARVATHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 058. …3 RSA NO. 1585/2018 3 4. SRI. G. SUDHARSHAN S/O MANJULA B. H. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/O M.E.S. PEENYA 3RD STAGE, SITE NO.15 PARVATHINAGAR BANGALORE- 560 058. 5. SRI. SHIVARUDRAPPA S/O LATE S. C. ERATHAPPA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/O SHRIRANGALA VILLAGE KUSHALANAGAR HOBLI SOMWARPET TALUK KODAGU DISTRICT – 571 234. ... RESPONDENT/S REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.01.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.19/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE KODAGU MADIKERI DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 23.01.2012 PASSED IN OS NO. 12/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MADIKERI. …4 RSA NO. 1585/2018 4 This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order. ORDER A week’s time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 10.02.2021, office objections are not complied with, hence appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : UN R By : RG C By : RP Ty Date: 05.06.2021 C Date: 10.06.2021