APHC010310642002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 23656/2002 Between: 1. CH.NAGA MAHESWARA RAO & 5 OTHERS, S/O SUBBA RAO WORKING IN DEPARTMENTAL FRUIT STALL, SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, 2. P. RAM BABU, S/O SUBBA RAO 3. SAPPA SATYANARAYANA, S/O CHINNAIAH 4. K. SIVA, S/O CHINNAIAH 5. L. RAJU, S/O NARASAIAH 6. N.V. RAMANA, S/O GOVIDNDA RAO ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS HYD ANOTHER, GOVERNEMNT OF A.P., HYDERABAD 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI VEERA VENKATA, SATYANARAYANA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature ow Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in rejecting the claim of the petitioners for regularization vide proceedings No. 2 A2/22288/2000 dated 28-6-2000 and further action of the respondents in contemplating to terminate the service of the petitioners in the guise of impugned proceedings as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art 14 of the constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 29694 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the service of the petitioners IA NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP 13752 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay the wages to the petitioners on par with other contract labour has fixed vide proceedings U.O.Note in R.C.NO.C2/4766/91 dated 07-01-2002 and revised salaries as confirmed by the 1st respondent vide proceedings D.Dis.No. A3/6173/05 dated 22-02-2005 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: ORDER: On 25.07.2025, learned counsel for the petitioners sought time to get instructions from his client as to whether anything survives in the writ petition or not. 2. Today, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are not in contact with him for a long time, as such, prayed to pass appropriate orders. 3 3. Since the matter pertains to the year 2002 and the petitioners had not been pursuing the case through his advocate, it shows that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioners feel that the cause still survives, they can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 22nd August, 2025 RKS