1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13768 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.09.2025 Prem Lata. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Junior Basic Teacher at GCPS Chamala, Education Block Kumarsain, District Shimla. She preferred a representation dated 11.03.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondents seeking her transfer under 5% Inter-District Policy. Petitioner’s grievance is that aforesaid representation has still not been decided by respondents/competent authority till date. -2- 3. Looking to the nature of the grievance raised in this writ petition, it would in the interest of justice to direct the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner in accordance with law and as per applicable policy within a period of six weeks from today. Ordered accordingly. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 5th September, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)