■ t APHC010311052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH.„ AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) /c I :C .5 *S. 'Ii THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUN TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE m o iTSi V PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N, WRIT PETITION NO: 15625 OF 202& Between: Nirmala Krishna Kumar Kollipara, S/o. Seetharamanjaneyulu, Aged 32 years, R/o. 41-27-55, Marvadi Temple Street, Brabarambapuram, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Petitioner ~ AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner, NTR Commissionerate, Vijayawada, NTR District. 4. The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District. ...Respondents . Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in registering multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) against the petitioner and his gym, THE SNAP 24/7 LLP, in connection with the closure of the gym are illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article/^14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of , as India, in contrary to the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in TT Antony v. State of Kerala and Others ((2001) AIR SC 2637) and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider all other complaints received in relation to present case as statements u/s. 181 of the BNSS, 2023 to Crime No. 169/2025, Crime No. 171/2025, and Crime No. 173/2025 on the file of the Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R District as per the principles laid down in judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in T.T. Antony vs State of Kerala and others (AIR 2001 SC 2637)r lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to file new First Information Reports for the same crime already registered vide Crime No. 169/2025, Crime No. 171/2025, and Crime No. 173/2025 on the file of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R District and to follow the direction the Hon’ble Apex Court in T.T. Antony vs State of Kerala & others (AIR 2001 SC 2637).^^ Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA - Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: APHC010311052025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15625/2025 Between: S/0. KOLLIPARA, KUMAR KRISHNA 1.NIRMALA SEETHARAMANJANEYULU, AGED 32 YEARS MARVADI TEMPLE STREET, LANKA, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. R/0. 41-27-55, BRABARAMBAPURAM, KRISHNA ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3.THE COMMISSIONER, NTR COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. 4.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S); Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in registering multiple First Information Reports (FIRs) against the petitioner and his gym, THE SNAP 24/7 LLP, in connection with the 2 W.P.NO.15625 OF 2025 closure of the gym, as are illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India, in contrary to the principles laid down by the Honble Supreme Court in TT Antony v. State of Kerala and Others ((2001) AIR SC 2637) and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider all other complaints received in relation to present case as statements u/s. 181 of the BNSS, 2023 to Crime No. 169/2025, Crime No. 171/2025, and Crime 173/2025 on the file of the Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R District as per the principles laid down in judgement passed by the Honble Apex Court in T.T. Antony vs State of Kerala and others (AIR 2001 SC 2637) and pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to file new First Information Reports for the same crime already registered vide Crime No. Crime No. 171/2025, and Crime No. 173/2025 on the file of Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada, N.T.R District and to follow the direction the Hon’ble Apex Court in T.T. Antony vs State of Kerala & others (AIR 2001 SC 2637) and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: No. 169/2025, 1.KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: t 3 % HN,J W.P.NO. 15625 OF 2025 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15625/2025 ORDER: The petitioner submits that for single cause of action different complaints are filed and the petitioner is facing multiple FIR’s for one single offence. The complainants against the petitioner cannot invoke the jurisdiction of different police stations. As of no\A/, the petitioner is facing allegations in three crimes. Crime No.169 of 2025 was registered on the file of Machavaram Police Station and subsequently, Crime No.171 of 2025 and Crime No.173 of 2025 were also registered at Machavaram Police Station for the alleged offence punishable under Section 318(4). Considering the submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner, there shall be a direction to the 4’^ respondent to investigate Crime No. 169 of 2025 and treat the complaints in the other crimes as statements under Section 171 of Cr.P.C ., It is also made clear any further complaints which are likely to be filed against the petitioner shall be treated as statement under Section 171 Cr.P.C 2. 3. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed off. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N1 RAWIESH BABU deputy REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, State of Andhra Pradesh, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, State of Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Commissioner, NTR Commissionerate, Vijayawada, NTR District. 4. The Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station NTR District. Vijayawada 5. One CC to Sri. Kilaru Nithin Krishna Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Three CD Copies GSC HIGH COURT DATED:26/06/2025 ORDER WP 15625/2025 1 JUL 2025 -V& Co ^^vCijfwntSectiguXC/ DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS