IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 365 of 2025 Date of Decision : 8.1.2026 Pratap Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Raj Kumar ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Sumit Sharma Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Report of learned District and Sessions Judge has been received. Learned District and Sessions Judge will take a call regarding the dereliction of duty by the concerned ofÏcer at his own level. It has been reported that the petitioner had died; hence, the proceedings have abated against him and the criminal revision is dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 8th January, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.