HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 43340 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, is taken on record. Learned counsel for the respondent no.4-Meerut Development Authority. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the Meerut Development Authority has raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the present writ petition on the ground that an efficacious and alternative statutory remedy is available to the petitioner under Section 41(3) of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, which has not been availed. It is thus contended that the instant petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of availability of such alternative remedy. 3. Learned counsel for the prays for withdrawal of instant petition with liberty to avail aforesaid statutory remedy. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 5. It is provided that, in the event of any delay in filing the revision, the same shall stand condoned, provided the appeal is instituted within a period of one month from the date of filing of the certified copy of this order. 6. Certified copy of relevant documents may be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining the photocopy of the same on record as per the rules of the High Court. April 23, 2026 A. Tripathi Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Bir Singh, Prateek Tyagi, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shashank Shekhar Singh, C.S.C., Shiv Prakash Gupta (Vinod Diwakar,J.) Tanuj Jain And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad