Mahalingam v. State rep. by The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/31680/2025 · 2025-11-20
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 220281 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 220281 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 20.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 Mahalingam ... Petitioner/A2 Vs. State By, The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District – 606 701 Crime No.395 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.395 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.Praveen Kumar P 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The petitioner herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 105, 238(a) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 135(1)(b) of Electricity Act, 2003 in Crime No.395 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused erected electricity fence near the lands of one Basha and it was accidentally touched by two persons belonging to the same village 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 and they died on the spot and hence the petitioners immediately taken the body and dumped into the nearby well. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that A1 in this case was arrested. . However, she opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the fact that the petitioner was involved in the offence of culpable homicide, where two persons died and also the fact that it is not 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 only case of causing death but also the screening of offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 20.11.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, Chengam Police Station, Thiruvannamalai District – 606 701 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.31680 of 2025 20.11.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis