Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22028 (RAJ)

CHIRANJI THR LRS v. SATISH CHAND

CSA/519/2017 · 2025-03-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:13520] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 519/2017 1. Chiranji S/o Kishori Lal, R/o Laxmangarh (Deceased) 1/1. Mst. Ramadevi Wd/o Chiranji Lal, aged about 70 years, R/o Laxmangarh District Alwar Raj. 1/2 Chhagan Lal S/o Late Chiranji Lal, aged about 44 years, R/o Laxmangarh District Alwar Raj. 1/3 Subhash S/o Late Chiranji Lal, aged about 42 years, R/o Laxmangarh District Alwar Raj. 1/4 Surendra S/o Late Chiranji Lal aged about 40 years, R/o Laxmangarh District Alwar Raj. 1/5 Babli S/o Late Chiranji Lal, aged about 35 years, R/o Laxmangarh District Alwar Raj. 1/6 Kamla D/o Late Chiranji Lal, W/o Deep Chand, aged about 45 years R/o Laxmangarh At Present R/o Bamnikheda, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Raj. 1/7. Santosh D/o Late Chiranji Lal, W/o Amichand, R/o Laxmangarh, aged about 38 years, At Present R/o Bamnikheda, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar Raj. ----Appellants Versus Satish Chand S/o Girraj Prasad, R/o Laxmangarh, aged about 60 years, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Bairwa for Mr. Aatish Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/03/2025 1. None present for the appellant. [2025:RJ-JP:13520] (2 of 2) [CSA-519/2017] 2. It appears that appellant has lost interest in pursuing the appeal. 3. Hence, instant S.B. Civil Second Appeal is hereby dismissed for non-prosecution with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MONU /89