Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15246 WP No. 10449 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 10449 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
ERA NAIK S/O SEVYA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT MUNDRE THANDYA, MUNDRE, BIRUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 116.
2.
SEVYA NAIK, S/O LATE THAVARYA NAIK, AGED ABOUT 87 YEARS R/AT MUNDRE THANDYA MUNDRE BIRUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577116
3.
GOVINDA NAIK S/O LATE SIDDA NAIK , AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS R/AT MUNDRE THANDYA MUNDRE BIRUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577116 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKAS M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S BUILDING, DR.B R AMBEDKAR VEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15246 WP No. 10449 of 2025
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB-DIVISION, TARIKERE TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228.
3.
RANGE FOREST OFFICER TARIKERE RANGE TARIKERE TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577228.
4.
THE TAHASILDAR, KADUR, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT-577548. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.SHIVA REDDY., AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT R2 TO PASS THE FINAL ORDER IN L.N.D. NO. 13/2024-25 PENDING IN THE COURT OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, TARIKERE WHICH HAS BEEN RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON 10/09/2024 VIDE ANNX-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
ORAL ORDER
1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the Assistant Commissioner to pronounce orders on the appeal which has been reserved on 10.09.2024.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15246 WP No. 10449 of 2025
2. In my view, since it is complained by the petitioners that the Assistant Commissioner had reserved the appeal for 'pronouncing orders' merely 7 months ago, it would be appropriate to direct the Assistant Commissioner to pronounce the orders within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
3. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
4. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE
HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17