Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22016 (RAJ)

KRISHNA S/O HEERA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7826/2025 · 2025-06-20

Maneesh Sharma V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23378] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7826/2025 Krishna S/o Heera Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Amberpur, Police Station Rajakhera, District Dholpur- Raj. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-Cum-AAG with Mr. Jai Prakash Tiwari, Dy.GA., Mr. Naresh Gupta, Dy.GA. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.313/2024 registered at Police Station Raja khera, District Dholpur, for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.09.2024 and the charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and the trial of the case will take considerable time, hence, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23378] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7826/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Government Advocates have opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner; also the fact that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 24.09.2024; the charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner; there are no criminal antecedent against the petitioner; the trial of the case will take considerable time, hence, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Krishna S/o Heera Singh shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in other offence(s) of similar nature during currency of the bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23378] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7826/2025] 8. The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J Seema/66