Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22014 (AP)

Pamidi Naganna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/14415/2019 · 2025-08-27

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010311282019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14415/2019 Between: 1. PAMIDI NAGANNA, S/O LATE PEDDA SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, RIO 4/50-A, TIPPIREDDY PALLE VILLAGE, N.OBAYIPALLE PANCHAYAT, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. PAMIDI OBULAMMA, W/O LATE OBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O 4-52, TIPPIREDDY PALLE VILLAGE,N.OBAYIPALLEPANCHAYAT, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. PAMIDI SIDDAIAH, SIO LATE PULLANNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O 4-43, TIPPIREDDY PAILE VILLAGE, N.OBAYIPALLE PANCHAYAT, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. PAMIDI RAMASUBBAIAH, S/O. LATE PULLANNA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, RIO 5-78, TIPPIREDDY PALLE VILLAGE, N.OBAYIPALLE PANCHAYAT, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDU, TULLUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KADAPA DISTRICT, KADAPA. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE M P D O, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. THE N OBAYIPALLE GRAMAPANCHAYAT, REP BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHAPADU, CHAPADU MANDAL,KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. K SRIHARI, S/O. AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS TAHSILDAR, CHAPADU, CHAPADU MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. M VISWANATHA REDDY, S/O AND AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, WORKING AS CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PRODDATUR RURAL P.S., KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in demolishing petitioners house bearing Nos. 4150-A, 4-52, 4-43 and 5-78 to an extent of 0.05 cents each situated at Tippireddy Palle Village, N.Obayipalle Panchayat, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District, without issuing any notice to the petitioners and without initiating any land acqusition proceedings under the act for widening the road is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, influenced by extraneous considerations, colourable exercise of powers, apart from violative of under Articles 14, and .21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and violation of well settled principle of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to take any coersive step to demolish the petitioners property house bearing Nos. 4/50-A, 4-52, 4-43 and 5-78 to an extent of 0.05 cents each situated at Tippireddy Palle Village, N.Obayipalle Panchayat, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to not to take any coersive step to demolish the petitioners property house bearing Nos. 4/50-A, 4-52, 4-43 and 5-78 to an extent of 0.05 cents each situated at Tippireddy Palle Village, N.Obayipalle Panchayat, Chapadu Mandal, Kadapa District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. M DELHI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.14415 OF 2019 ORDER: 1. Sri.D.Harsha vardhan, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner(s) seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission as sought for is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Dated:28.08.2025 BSP 34 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO.14415 OF 2019 Dated:28.08.2025 BSP