Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 22013 (AP)

Smt .D.Estaramma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/20576/2020 · 2025-02-20

Kiranmayee Mandava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) '' THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 'j PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 20576 OF 2020 Between: Smt .D.Estaramma, W/o Daniel, aged about 39 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Kola Bheemunipadu Village, Markapuram Mandal, Praksam District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Prakasam District at Ongole. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Marakpuram Division, Marakpuram, Prakasam District. 4. The Tahsildar, Markapuram Mandal, Marakpuram, Prakasam District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the agricultural land to an extent of Ac. 4.80 cents in Sy. Nos. 47/2A, 48/2 and 84/1A of K.Bheemunipadu Village, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District which is in her possession and enjoyment in pursuance to the assignment patta grante din her favour on 23.3.1992 in R.Dis/DAR/111/1401 by the 4^^ respondent, without following the due procedure as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and fair play, consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid property without following due process of law. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land to an extent of Ac. 4.80 cents in Sy. Nos. 47/2A, 48/2 and 84/1A of K.Bheemunipadu Village, Markapuram Mandal, Prakasam District by dispossession or otherwise, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI HARANADHA RAJU KATTA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010310902020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 20576/2020 Between: ...Petitioner Smt. D.Estaramma AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to present writ petition stating that the appeal filed before the Revenue Divisional Officer/District Collector was dismissed. ...Respondents Haranadha Raju Katta GP for Revenue withdraw the 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granted liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies under law. No costs, sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR As a //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri Haranadha Raju Katta, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:20/02/2025 ORDER f 2 7 MAR 2025 Current Section ^ WP.No.20576 Of 2020 ij DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS