2025:JHHC:13789 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5844 of 2024 ------ Vivek Nagraj @ Vicky Kumar Singh, son of Sri Krishna Nagraj, R/o at near Hanuman Mandir, Patratu Basti, P.O. & P.S. Ramgarh, District Ramgarh, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishu Ranjan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. ----- 09/ 07.05.2025 This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.155 of 2024, for offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 504, 506 and 120-B IPC. The case is presently pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ramgarh. 2. Learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that there is an inordinate delay in lodging the F.I.R. He further submits that there was no agreement between this petitioner and the informant, rather it is Tapan Giri, who has sold the vehicle to the informant and received the amount. He further submits that the vehicle was also not found in possession of the petitioner. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. After hearing the parties and from perusal of the materials and documents on record, I find that the informant has purchased the Car from Tapan Giri, by paying full consideration amount. When the informant was driving the car, this petitioner 2025:JHHC:13789 2 and others intercepted him and took away the car forcibly on the ground that some amount has not been paid to the financer, and handed over the car to Tapan Giri. 5. Though there was no allegation that the petitioner had taken part in the sale and purchase of the vehicle but the fact remains that the petitioner has forcibly taken the vehicle from the informant while he was driving the same. 6. Considering the involvement of the petitioner in the aforesaid offence, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. 8. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3