[2025:RJ-JP:23568] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7843/2025 Munesh Kumar Meena S/o Balaji Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Fulbada, P.S. Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Jail Hindouncity) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sukhdev Singh Solanki, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.) Order 26/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.219/2025 registered at Police Station Sadar Hindaun City, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 8/21 and 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that false recovery of smack weighing 14.28gms has been shown at the instance of the petitioner. Counsel submits that alleged recovered quantity is below commercial quantity. Counsel submits that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. It is further contended that petitioner is in custody since 29.05.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:23568] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-7843/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that one other case has also been registered against the petitioner under the NDPS Act. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Munesh Kumar Meena S/o Balaji Meena shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:23568] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-7843/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN (V. J.)),J MADAN/77