Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21999 (CAL)

ANANDAMAY MONDAL v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/9759/2025 · 2025-06-24

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sl.No. 4M Court No. 35 G.S.Das 24.06.2025 WPA 9759 of 2025 Anandamay Mondal -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. G.K. Chowdhury … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Asish Kumar Guha Mr. Benazir Ahmed … for the State-respondent(s) Re Learned advocate for the petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the representation which was advanced to the Officer-in-charge of Guskara Police Station was not considered in its proper perspective. I have considered the contents of the representation which has its genesis in a land dispute. The petitioner has in the representation accused the private respondents for interference and for trying to grab his property which was at its disposal. Be that as it may, the police authorities will not ordinarily interfere in relation to the disputes of land. The petitioner would approach the appropriate authority for the relief in respect of the dispute concerning land. However, the police authorities would keep a strict vigil as also ensure that no breach of the peace and/or tranquility takes place as also no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship existing between the parties. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 9759 of 2025 is disposed of. Pending connected application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Report so submitted be kept with the record. A copy of the report be handed over to the petitioner. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)