1 2025:CGHC:25758 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 317 of 2022 1 - Satanand Agrawal S/o Late Ramdhyan Agrawal Aged About 75 Years Resident Of Mig-57, Housing Board Colony, Tatibandh, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Dr. Vivek Agrawal S/o Shri Satanand Agrawal Aged About 47 Years Resident Of B-52, Wallfort City, Bhathagaon, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioners versus 1 - Smt. Manju Agrawal W/o Shri Govind Agrawal Aged About 55 Years Resident Of Through Rs Niwas, Opposite Canara Bank, Gurunanak Ward, Gondiya (Maharashtra) 441601 2 - Smt. Sandhya Agarwal W/o Shri Manoj Agrawal, Aged About 53 Years Resident Of Childhood Convent Gali No. 3, Tatibandh, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri B.P. Sharma, Advocate alongwith Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Advocate. For Respondents : Shri Devershi Thakur, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19.06.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this petition has been preferred against the rejection of an application moved under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC. He would contend that the civil SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- suit has been filed by the respondents claiming therein reliefs of declaration of title and permanent injunction against the father and brother. He would contend that the civil suit was filed on 13.4.2022. It is also contended that the application under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC was rejected and the interim order is currently operating in favour of the petitioners. He would submit that a direction may be issued to the learned trial Court to conclude the proceedings of the pending Civil Suit No.29A of 2022 within a stipulated time. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners, at this juncture, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the concerned trial Court to make all endeavours to conclude the proceedings of pending civil suit preferably within a period of nine months. The petitioners would be at liberty to raise all grounds which have been raised in the present petition. 5. Interim order granted earlier is hereby vacated. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi