1 2025:CGHC:21646 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2492 of 2025 1 - Mayaram Patel S/o Mahesh Ram @ Nanhuram Aged About 57 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 2 - Haldhar Prasad Patel S/o Mahesh Ram @ Nanhuram Aged About 51 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - Ramcharan S/o Mahettar Aged About 65 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Shivcharan S/o Mahettar Aged About 49 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Samari Bai D/o Mahettar Aged About 46 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Budhiyarin Widow Of Mahettar Aged About 83 Years By Caste- Patel, Occupation- Agriculturist, R/o Village- Chhote Devgaon, P.H.No. 40, P/s. And Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector District Raigarh, (C.G.) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.05.12 16:43:07 +0530 2 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 09.05.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is alternative efficacious remedy in their favour to approach before the appropriate forum for redressal of their grievance, as such he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach before the concerned authorities. 2. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3. Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach before the appropriate forum. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh