Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21992 (GAU)

JIAUR RAHMAN @ JIAHUR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/1280/2024 · 2025-01-28

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010270792024 2025:GAU-AS:1013 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/1280/2024 JIAUR RAHMAN @ JIAHUR RAHMAN S/O LATE NOSIR UDDIN R/O VILL- KANDIGRAM BIHARA PART-V, P.S. KATIGORAH DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM PIN-788805 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:HURMAT ALI S/O LATE HAZI MOKBUL ALI R/O VILL KANDIGRAM BIHARA PART-V P.S. KATIGORAH DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PI-78880 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A S TAPADER, MR M AHMED,MR. S B LASKAR,MR. H A LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 29.01.2025 Heard learned counsel, Mr A S Tapader, appearing on behalf of the applicant, Jiaur Rahman @ Jiahur Rahman, who has filed this application for correction of a typographical Page No.# 2/2 error emerging in the order dated 22.11.2024, in Criminal Revision Petition No. 470/2024. 2. The GR case number, i.e.”GR Case No. 3949/2011” has been erroneously typed in the order as-“GR Case No. 3849/2011”. The applicant has prayed for rectification of this typographical error. 3. Heard Ms N Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State respondent. 4. The application is allowed. 5. Wherever the words and figures-“GR Case No. 3849/2011” is typed in Criminal Revision Petition No. 470/2024, it should be rectified and corrected as “GR Case No. 3949/2011”, instead of “GR Case No. 3849/2011”, in Criminal Revision Petition No. 470/2024. 6. In terms of the above observations, this interlocutory application stands disposed of. 7. This order will also form a part of the order dated 22.11.2024, passed in Criminal Revision Petition No. 470/2024. JUDGE Comparing Assistant