1 2025:CGHC:26021-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WA No. 379 of 2025 1 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Bilaspur, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattigarh 2 - Collector-Cum-Authorized Officer Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Sunil Kumar Sahu S/o Santram Sahu Aged About 31 Years R/o Q.No. Te-08 Cseb Colony, Budhwari Bazaar, Korba East District Korba Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Co- Operative Societies, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Po And P.S. Rakhi, Dist. Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Registrar, Co-Operative Societies Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - Joint Registrar Co-Operative Societies Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Commissioner (Rev.) Bilaspur Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Chairman/ Board Of Directors., Zila Sahakari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, Bilaspur, Nehru Chowk, Bilaspur Dist. Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.06.20 17:27:55 +0530 2 For Appellant(s) : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 20.06.2025 1. Heard Ms. Seema Verma, learned counsel for the appellants as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 2. The present writ appeal is directed against the order dated 12.03.2025 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in WPS No.4309/2020, whereby the writ petition filed by respondent No.1 / writ petitioner was allowed. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the issue involved in this writ appeal has already been considered and decided by this Court vide judgment dated 10.06.2025 in WA No.318 of 2025, whereby the Division Bench of this Court has held as under:- “16. For the foregoing reasons and also considering the fact that the identical writ appeal has already been decided, the instant writ appeal is partly allowed and the impugned order dated 12.03.2025 passed by the learned Single Judge so far as it relates to the direction to respondent authorities to reinstate the services of the petitioner without back wages is concerned, the 3 same is set aside. 17. Further considering the fact that writ petitioner / respondent No.1 and other similarly situated writ petitioner, who are 29 in number, are not in service since, 2015, we direct the appellants herein/respondent Nos. 5 & 7 therein to conclude the fresh proceedings, as has been ordered by the learned Single Judge, as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 4. In view of above, the present writ appeal is partly allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court in WA No.318 of 2025. No cost(s). Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet