Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2199 (UTT)

AJAY KUMAR BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/1/2014 · 2025-08-06

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6898-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/1/2014 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. (per : Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. 2. Mr. Harsh Rautela, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the petitioner submits that this writ petition was filed in the year 2014, seeking promotion to the post of Chief Engineer in Public Works Department. 3. He submits that at the time of filing the writ petition, petitioner was 59 years of age. Thus he submits that writ petition has become infructuous as the petitioner attained the age of superannuation in 2015. 4. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 06.08.2025 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1 a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B 1BC9EA4BABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.08.06 17:42:43 +05'30'