Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 219898 (MAD)

Z. SANTHAKUMAR v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/42574/2025 · 2025-11-11

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.42574 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.11.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN W.P.No.42574 of 2025 Z.Santhakumar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd., No..2, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. .... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay interest @ 10% for the belated payment of terminal benefits such as gratuity, provident fund, leave salary and commutation of pension amount and difference in gratuity and leave salary based on 15th wage settlement dated 29.05.2025 with 10% interest to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.S.T.Varadarajalu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42574 of 2025 For Respondents : Mr.A.Vinothraj, Standing Counsel (for R1) ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for direction directing the respondents to pay appropriate interest to the petitioner for the delayed sanction and disbursement of retirement benefits. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record. 3. In identical issues, this Court has passed various orders, justifying the payment of interest to the aggrieved pensioners and in the order dated 13.12.2019 in W.P.(MD) No.26481 of 2019, the following order came to be passed :- “5. I am not in agreement with the said representation made. There was already a duty cast on the respondent Corporation to pay the terminal benefits on the date of retirement itself and the very fact that the belated disbursement of retirement benefit, had already put the retired employee to serious prejudice, entertaining the present request for disbursement of the interest on the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42574 of 2025 belated payment in installments, could cause further prejudice to the retired employee. 6. In the light of the above observations, there shall be a direction to the respondent / Corporation to pay the penal interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the belated payment of the retirement benefits for the period from the date of the retirement, till the date of the actual disbursement, as expeditiously as possible and in any event, not before the expiry of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. This Court is of the view that the first respondent could be directed to pay the interest on the belated payment, at the rate of 6% per annum, as ordered in the above writ petition. 5. In the light of the above findings, there shall be a direction to the first respondent herein to pay the interest on the belated payment of the terminal benefits to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum, commencing from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42574 of 2025 6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 11.11.2025 Internet : Yes Index : Yes/No kv To 1. The Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation 9Chennai) Ltd., No..2, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. 2. The Administrator, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Employees Pension Fund Trust, No.2, Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.42574 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. kv W.P.No.42574 of 2025 11.11.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis