APHC010309802020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20513/2020 Between: 1. GANJI SUJATHA, W/O GANJI VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, OCCU. HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF. FLAT NO.406, SURVEY NO.723/2B, CHALASANI TOWNSHIP, NEAR NUNNA POWER GRID, NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL - 521212, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. GANJI VIJAYA KUMAR, S/O G. SUBBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCCU. RAILWAY EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF. FLAT NO.406, SURVEY NO.723/2B, CHALASANI TOWNSHIP, NEAR NUNNA POWER GRID, NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL - 521212, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. GANJI SAMUEL JOHN, S/O GANJI VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCCU. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RESIDENT OF. FLAT NO.406, SURVEY NO.723/2B, CHALASANI TOWNSHIP, NEAR NUNNA POWER GRID, NUNNA, VIJAYAWADA RURAL - 521212, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, MANAV ADHIKAR BHAVAN, BLOCK -C, GPO COMPLEX, INA, NEW DELHI - 110023, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, GRUHAKALPA BUILDING, EXHIBITION GROUNDS ROAD, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT AT ELURU. 6. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, OFFICE AT SURYARAOPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. KONDA RAMESH, S/O LATE KONDA SESHAIAH, AGE 38 YEARS, OCCU. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, RIO D.NO.5-88, OPP. M.R.O'S OFFICE, DWARAKA TIRUMALA POST AND MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 534 426. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondents 3 to 6 herein and their Subordinate Officers in interfering with the Civil Disputes between the Petitioners and the 7th Respondent herein by calling the Petitioners herein to the Police Station and pressurizing them to settle the alleged disputes with the 7th Respondent herein under the threat of foisting false cases against the Petitioners herein by saying that if anything happened to the life of the 7th Respondent herein the Petitioners herein would be held liable for the same, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19, and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondents 3 to 6 herein and their Subordinate Officers, not into interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and 7th Respondents herein by way of frequently calling them to the Police Station under the guise of series of false complaints made by the 7th Respondent herein, forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to Direct the Respondents 3 to 6 herein and their Subordinate Officers, not to interfere with the Civil disputes between the Petitioners and 7th Respondent herein by calling the petitioners herein to the Police Station, pressurizing them to settle the alleged disputes with the 7th Respondent herein, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. CHALASANI AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. M R K CHAKRAVARTHY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 20513 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein and their Subordinate Officers in interfering with the Civil Disputes between the Petitioners and the 7th Respondent herein by calling the Petitioners herein to the Police Station and pressurizing them to settle the alleged disputes with the 7th Respondent herein under the threat of foisting false cases against the Petitioners herein by saying that if anything happened to the life of the 7th Respondent herein the Petitioners herein would be held liable for the same, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 19, and 21 of Constitution of India and Consequently direct the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 herein and their Subordinate Officers, not into interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioners and 7th Respondents herein by way of frequently calling them to the Police Station under the guise of series of false complaints made by the 7th Respondent herein, forthwith and to pass…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ petition is disposed of. However, the Police are directed to follow due process of law, in case if any crime is registered against the petitioners herein. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 18.08.2025. SRT HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20513 of 2020 Dated.18.08.2025 UPS 133