Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20904 WP No. 13356 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 13356 OF 2024 (SCST) BETWEEN:
1.
2. CHIKKANNEGOWDA SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.
CHIKKAMMA W/O CHIKKANNE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
3. LATHA D/O CHIKKANNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
4.
KUMAR C S/O CHIKKANNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
5. JAYARAM S/O CHIKKANNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHIKKANAHALLI GRAMA ILAWALA HOBLI -571130 MYSURU TALUK AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. MOHANA KUMARI B.V., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY,
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20904 WP No. 13356 of 2024
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU 560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU 570 001.
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU SUB DIVISION, D C OFFICE BUILDING, MYSURU 570005.
4. BOGAYYA S/O LATE MANCHAIAH, AGED :MAJOR, CHIKKANAHALLI GRAMA A K COLONY, ILAWALA - 571130, MYSURU TALUK MYSURU DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19.12.2023 PASSED IN CASE NO.
PTCL.05/2018 (RD0050000189862) BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 VIDE ANNX-L IN CONSEQUENCE ALSO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2018 PASSED IN CASE NO. PTCL 01/2010 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNX-E.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20904 WP No. 13356 of 2024
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
1. In this writ petition, this Court, vide order dated 29.04.2025 has passed the following order:
" 1. None appears.
2. Four weeks time is finally granted to comply with the office objections, if not complied by 17.06.2025, the petition would be liable to be dismissed.
3. Re-list on 17.06.2025. "
2. Accordingly, since office objections have not been complied with, the writ petition is dismissed.
3. Consequently, I.A.1/2024 does not survive for
consideration.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9