Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21979 (RAJ)

PURAN MAL v. B O R AJMER AND ORS

CW/8959/2008 · 2025-02-17

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6797] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8959/2008 Puran Mal son of Surji, resident of Bugliyon ki Dhani, Tan Ajadi and Kulod Khurd at present Pithusar Dy. Tehsildar, Malsisar, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Board of Revenue, Ajmer. 2. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur 3. Mst. Shanti D/o Late Mohan Lal wife of Tara Chand, resident of Kulidkhurd, at present Hejampura, Tehsil and District Jhunjhunu 4. Bhagwana Ram (Deceased) 5. Amar Singh 6. Rameshwar @ Raju 7. Raji Lal 4 to 6 are sons of Surji and Kaluram, resident of Bugliyon ki Dhani Tan Ajadi and Kulyodkhurd at present Pithusar Tehsil and District Jhunjhunu 8. Kamla daughter of Surji and Kaluram wife of Sardararam, resident of Khajpura Naya Tehasil and District Jhunjhunu 9. Ram Pyari Daughter of Surji and Kaluram wife of Phoolji Village Getoka Bas, Tan Patusar Tehasil and District Jhunjhunu. 10. Vimal daughter of Surji and Kaluram wife of Hanuman, resident of Dilsar Tehasil and District Jhunjhunu. 11. Mohari daughter of Bisna Ram wife of Hemaram, resident of Bugliyon ki Dhani Tan Ajani Khurd and Kulod Khurd Tehasil and District Jhunjhunu 12. Risaldi Daughter of Surji and Kaluram wife of Rameshwar resident ofGokhri Tehasil and District Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Rohan Agarwal for Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arun Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 17/02/2025 1. An application (2/2025) has been filed by and on behalf of petitioner seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, stating inter alia, that the parties have amicably settled the dispute. [2025:RJ-JP:6797] (2 of 2) [CW-8959/2008] 2. In that view, petitioner does not want to continue the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. 3. Respondents have no objection to the same. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /83