LIYAKAT ALIAS MD LIYAKAT ALIAS LIYAKAT ALI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./4484/2025 · 2025-08-18
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21979 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21979 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:24049
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
ABA No. 4484 of 2025
1. Liyakat @ Md. Liyakat @ Liyakat Ali, aged about 64 years, Son of Late Kallu
2. Md. Sahil Shahjada @ Md. Shahjad, aged about 42 years, Son of Md. Liyakat
3. Md. Guljar @ Guljar Alam , aged about 36 years, Son of Md. Liyakat All resident of village Matwari, Azad Mohalla, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S. Sadar, District – Hazaribag ….. …. Petitioners
Versus The state of Jharkhand
..... … Opp. Party
--------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State
: Mr., Naveen Kumar Ganjhu, A.P.P. ------
04/18.08.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No.33 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribag.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegations of assault. He submits that the allegations are made of assault and there is case and counter case between the parties and the co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.2807 of 2025.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault.
5. It appears from the FIR that there is direct allegation of assault
2025:JHHC:24049
upon Md. Guljar @ Guljar Alam, who is petitioner No.3.
6. In view of that, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail, so far as Petitioner No.3 is concerned.
7. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected.
8. However, there are omnibus and general allegations against the petitioner No.1 and 2 and other co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail so far as Petitioner No.1 and 2 are concerned.
9. Accordingly, the petitioner No.1 and Petitioner No.2 above named are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of their surrender / arrest, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Hazaribag, in connection with Korrah P.S. Case No.33 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
10. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly disposed of.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) R.Kumar