Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 21976 (RAJ)

VASEEM KHAN S/O PAPPU KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7780/2025 · 2025-07-31

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29291] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7780/2025 Vaseem Khan S/o Pappu Khan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Padla, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7781/2025 Imran Khan S/o Ishak Mohammad Alias Ishan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village Padla, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg, (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 31/07/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.216/2024 registered at Police Station-Khoh, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Since both the bail applications have arisen from common order, hence, they are being decided by this single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:29291] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7780/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners named have not been mentioned in the FIR. Co- accused-Umardeen, Majid, Anis @ Anni, Anees @ Anees Khan, Lakhan, Mausam Khan, Sakir Khan, Arman Khan, Rahul Khan and Aasif have been released on bail by Coordinate Bench of this Court as well as by trial Court. Petitioners are behind the bars since 29.05.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case, on the ground of parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners-Vaseem Khan S/o Pappu Khan and Imran Khan S/o Ishak Mohammad Alias Ishan shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/269-270