- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6081 CRP No. 528 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 528 OF 2018 BETWEEN: MR MOHAMMED FAKHRUDDIN AJMAL S/O AJMALALI HAJI ABDUL MAJID AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT NO.35 IMPERIAL COURT CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE REP. BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MR SYED SHUAIB RAZVI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS S/O S.J.M.RAZVI R/A NO.14, 13TH CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD, CHINNAA GARDEN BENGALURU-560046. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHABALESHWARA G C., & SRI. KIRAN P.M., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SMT. CHANDRAMMA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS D/O LATE MAVALLI MUNIYAPPA W/O RAMAKRISHNAPPA R/AT CHIKKATHEKAHALLI VILLAGE, BASHETIHALLI HOBLI SIDLGHATTA TALUK-562105 Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6081 CRP No. 528 of 2018 2. SRI NAGARAJA S/O LATE MAVALLI MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/AT WARD NO.12, MARALU BAGILU DEVANAHALLI TOWN-562110 3. SMT RAMAKKA W/O RAMASWAMAPA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT NEELERI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110 …RESPONDENTS (R2 & R3 SERVED – UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED U/S.115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DTD 06.08.2018 PASSED ON IA.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC PASSED IN OS.NO.391/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC DEVANAHALLI, REJECTING THE IA.NO.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11 R/W 151 OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the original suit from out of which the present civil revision petition arises viz., O.S.No.391/2016 was dismissed in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties on - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:6081 CRP No. 528 of 2018 30.01.2025. Therefore, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the civil revision petition stands disposed of, since the prayer made in the civil revision petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY CT: JL