A.Aruna, v. Dr.N.T.R. University of Health Sciences,
WP/14007/2018 · 2025-06-30
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 21972 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010309872018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14007/2018 Between:
1. A.ARUNA, D/O SAMUDRALU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, TELEPHONE OPERATOR, DR.N.T.R.UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. DR N T R UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, REP., BY ITS REGISTRAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST.
2. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, DR.N.T.R.UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST.
3. ANDHRA UNIVERSITY, REP BY ITS REGISTRAR, WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. PRL SECY MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECREATARY, HEALTH, MEDICAL AND FAMILY WELFAR DEPARTMENT, SECREATAIAT, VELAGAPUDI, ANIARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. PRL SECY FINANCE DEPT STATE OF A P, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST, SECRETARIAT, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for regularization of her servicers as G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994 by taking into
consideration of the orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.2950/1998, dt.28-03- 2007 as void, illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, contrary to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of her services as G.O.Ms.No.212, dated 22.04.1994 by taking into consideration of the orders passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.2950/1998, dt.28.03-2007 with effect from the completion of five (5) years of service from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefit and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K LAKSHMANA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T V SRI DEVI SC FOR NTR HEALTH UNIVERSITY
2. '
3. GP FOR SERVICES I
4. GANGA KUMAR CHAKRAVARTULA
5. GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW(AP)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioner for regularization of her servicers as G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 by taking into consideration of the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No.2950/1998 dt 28.03.2007 as void, illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional contrary to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization of her services as G.O.Ms.No.212 dated 22.04.1994 by taking into consideration of the orders passed by this Honble Court in WP No.2950/1998 dt.28.03.2007 with effect from the completion of five 5 years of service from the date of initial appointment with all consequential benefit and to pass.....”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent NTR Health University and Sri Ganga Kumar Chakravarthula, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-Andhra University are in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 14007 of 2018
01.07.2025
Mjl /*