Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:57457 Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6467 of 2025 Applicant :- Ravi Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Suresh Dhar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. 2. Heard Sri Suresh Dhar Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ajay Singh, learned AGA-I for the State and perused the material on record. 3. This bail application under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the applicant-Ravi Yadav, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No.476 of 2024, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, registered at P.S.Kotwali District Shahjahanpur. 4. The first information report of the present matter was lodged on 16.9.2024 by Raja Ram Yadav against the applicant and five other persons alleging therein that the marriage of his daughter Asha was solemnized with Ravi Yadav (the applicant) on 13.5.2018. After marriage the accused persons used to torture & trouble her for dowry. There was demand of Rs.2 lakh as dowry by the accused persons and due to non-fulfillment of the same, there was disputed between them. There was love affair of the applicant with another woman which was objected by his daughter due to which her husband assaulted her and told his daughter to died due to which his daughter committed suicide on 16.9.2024 at 5.30 a.m. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that although the applicant is the husband of the deceased but he is not involved in the matter. It is submitted that the allegations as levelled against the applicant and other co-accused persons are general and omnibus in nature. It is submitted that the deceased committed suicide and died in her parental house. It is submitted that the applicant has no criminal history as stated in para 17 and is in jail since 22.9.2024. 6. Per contra, learned counsel for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the applicant is the husband of the deceased. It is submitted that there is an allegation of demand of dowry against the applicant and other co-accused persons. The bail application of the applicant be thus rejected. 7. After having heard learned counsel for the parties and perusing the record, it is evident that the applicant is the husband of the deceased. There is an allegation of demand of dowry, torture and harassment by the applicant and other co-accused persons. 8. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not find it a fit case for bail, hence, the bail application is rejected. 9. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 18.4.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad